Basic features of the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70000/cj.2023.68.569Keywords:
FRSAD, subject authority, subject headingsAbstract
This article aims to introduce the main features of the Functional Requirements Model for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD), in terms of its need, objectives, scope, origin, reasons for its issuance, methodology for its preparation, and its relationship to the FRBR and FRAD models, as well as its relationship to related models such as the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the Dublin Core Initiative. The DCMI metadata, as well as its relationship with subject authority systems, its application in the rules for Resources Description and Access (RDA), and its Arabization efforts and translations into other languages.
References
ASIS&T. (2020, June 07). DCMI Abstract Model. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/resources/glossary/dcmi_abstract_model/
Bekiari, C., Martin, D., Le Boeuf, P., & Riva, P. (Eds.). (2015, November). Definition of FRBR: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information in Object Oriented Formalism. Den Haag, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/FRBRoo/frbroo_v_2.4.pdf
CIDOC-CRM. (2019, 09 06). FRBRoo. Retrieved from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbroo/home-0
Furner, J. (2012, June 20). FRSAD and the Ontology of Subjects of Works. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, pp. 494-516.
Galeffi, A. (2017). Statement of international cataloging principles (ICP). Den Haag, Netherlands: IFLA.
Hutchins, W. J. (1978). The concept of aboutness in subject indexing. Colloquium on Aboutness (pp. 172-181). Norwich: Aslib Proceedings.
IFLA. (2018, December 27). Authority control. Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/best-practice-for-national-bibliographic-agencies-in-a-digital-age/node/9031
O'Neill, E. T., & Mai Chan, L. (2003). FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology): a simplified LCSH-based vocabulary. World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council (pp. 1-12). Berlin: IFLA.
OWL Working Group. (2012, December 11). Web Ontology Language (OWL). Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/200sw/wiki/OWL
Poulter, A. (2013). Filling in the blanks in RDA or remaining blank? the strange case of FRSAD. In New directions in information organization, library and information science (volume 7, pp. 43-59). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
RDA Steering Committee. (2010, June 22). Identifying concepts. Retrieved from http://access.rdatoolkit.org/
Riva, P. (2015, September 16). Introducing IFLA library reference model. (N. Abdel-Meguid, Compiler) Cape Town.
Riva, P., Le Bœuf, P., & Žumer, M. (2017, August). Overview of differences between IFLA LRM and the FRBR-FRAD-FRSAD models. Den Haag.
Riva, P., Le Boeuf, P., & Žumer, M. (2017, December). IFLA Library Reference Model: A conceptual model for bibliographical information. Den Haag. Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11412
RDA Steering Committee. (2019, April 30). Standards related to RDA. Retrieved from https://beta.rdatoolkit.org/Guidance/Index?externalId=en-US_ala-916433bf-614d-378e-a3a0-c3649c79a42c
Tillet, B. B. (2016, May). RDA, or the long journey of the catalog to the digital age. JLIS, vol. 7(n. 1). doi:10.4403/jlis.it-11643
Working Group on FRBR/CRM Dialogue. (2017, May 22). Definition of FRBRoo: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information in Object-Oriented Formalism. Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11240
Zavalina, O. L. (2012, September 17). Subject access: conceptual models, functional requirements, and empirical data. Journal of Library Metadata, p. 141.
Zeng, M. L. (2014, June 01). Introducing FRSAD and Mapping it with SKOS. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228580967
Zeng, M. L., & Žumer, M. (2009). Introducing FRSAD and mapping it with other models. Milan, Italy: IFLA.
Zeng, M. L., Žumer, M., Salaba, A. (2010). Functional requirements for subject authority data (FRSAD): A conceptual model. Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.
Zumer, M. (2012). FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness. California: ABC-CLIO.
Žumer, M., & Riva, P. (2017). IFLA LRM – finally here. International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, (pp. 13-23). Retrieved from http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3852
Al-Shāmī, A. M., wa-Ḥasab Allāh, S. (2018, December 26). Al-Ḍabṭ al-istinādī. Fī Muṣṭalaḥāt al-Maktabāt wa-al-Maʻlūmāt wa-al-Arshīf. Tam al-istirjāʻ min: http://www.elshami.com/Default.htm.
Al-ʻĀyidī, M. ʻA. (2005). Bināʼ wa-istikhdām qawāʼim ruʼūs al-mawḍūʻāt al-ʻArabīyah wa-al-ajnabīyah. Al-Qāhirah: Shams al-Maʻārif.
Samīʻ, L. S. (2009, July). Niẓām al-ḍabṭ al-istinādī al-ālī lil-mawḍūʻāt: al-khaṣāʼiṣ wa-al-tajārib. Al-Ittijāhāt al-Ḥadīthah fī al-Maktabāt wa-al-Maʻlūmāt, Maj. 16(ʻA 32, p. 241-269).
ʻAbd al-Hādī, M. F. (1993). Al-Muʻāljah al-fannīyah li-awʻiyah al-maʻlūmāt: al-fahrasah - al-taṣnīf - al-takshīf - al-ḍabṭ al-istinādī. Al-Qāhirah: Maktabat Gharīb.
Olivia Madison, John Byrum, Jr., Suzanne Jouguelet, Dorothy McGarry, Nancy Williamson, wa Maria Wi. (2009). Al-Muṭallabāt al-fannīyah lil-tasjīlāt al-bibliyūghrāfīyah: al-taqrīr al-nihāʼī. (Duʻāʼ ʻAlá Muḥammad, mutarjimah) Al-Ittiḥād al-Dawlī li-Jamaʻiyyāt wa-Muʼassasāt al-Maktabāt.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fatima Zaqzouq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
