Genognosis: AI's impact on knowledge production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70000/cj.2025.75.634Keywords:
Genognosis, Artificial Intelligence, AI, knowledge productionAbstract
This study explores the impact of generative artificial intelligence on knowledge production through a new framework called "Genognosis." It examines the philosophical and historical dimensions of knowledge while addressing challenges such as forced knowledge standardization, algorithmic and linguistic bias. The study aims to analyze the transformations in human knowledge structures and introduce a model explaining the dynamic interaction between humans and AI in generating knowledge. The discussion highlights the necessity of establishing standards to ensure knowledge equity and balance between human and AI-driven knowledge production. The study recommends strengthening human oversight, diversifying data sources, promoting cultural and linguistic diversity in AI systems, and implementing ethical guidelines to regulate digital knowledge creation.
References
ʻAbbās, Yāsmīn Ḥusayn. (2024). Athar taṭbīqāt al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī ʻalá intāj al-baḥth al-ʻilmī fī al-jāmiʻāt. Majallat al-Maʻhad al-ʻĀlī li-al-Dirāsāt al-Nawʻiyyah, pp. 239–283. Retrieved 1 2, 2025, from: https://doi.org/10.21608/hiss.2024.292718.1349
ʻAbd al-Razzāq, Mī Muṣṭafá. (2022). Taqaniyyāt al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī fī al-iʻlām.. al-wāqiʻ wa-al-taṭawwurāt al-mustaqbaliyyah. al-Majallah al-Miṣriyyah li-Buḥūth al-Iʻlām, pp. 1–74. Retrieved 2 1, 2025, from: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsc.2022.272038
Angwin, J., Larson, J., & Mattu, S. (2025, 2 2). Machine Bias. Retrieved from ProPublica: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
ʻAwāḍah, Ḥanān ʻAlī. (2010). al-Nazʻah al-tajrībiyyah ʻinda Jūn Lūk bayna al-ḥiss wa-al-ʻaql. Majallat Lārāk, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 163–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss2.19
Bloom, J. M. (2001). Paper before print: the history and impact of paper in the Islamic world. . New Haven: Yale University Press.
Buolamwini, J. &. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency . In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (pp. 77-91). PMLR.
Carter, T. F. (1925). The invention of printing in China and its spread westward. Columbia University Press. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Febvre, L. &. (1976). (1976). *The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450-1800*. . New York: Verso.
Foster, R. (2024). The Linguistic Bias of AI: Navigating Cultural Homogenisation in a Digital Age. Retrieved 2 4, 2025, from Richard Foster-Fletcher: https://fosterfletcher.com/the-linguistic-bias-of-ai/
Goody, J. (1987). The Interface between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grusauskaite, K. C. (2014). Debating (in) echo chambers: How culture shapes communication in conspiracy theory networks on YouTube. 26(12). New Media & Society, 7037-7057. Retrieved 2 2, 2025, from https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/714704
Ḥasan, Rashīd Nāẓim, and Ablḥad, Afrām Mī. (2023). Tadqīq al-taḥayyuz fī al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī fī ḍawʼ iṭār ʻamal tadqīq al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī li-Muʻtaṣad al-Mudqqiqīn al-Dākhilīyīn (IIA) - dirāsah naẓariyyah taḥlīliyyah. Majallat al-Dirāsāt al-Tijārīyah wa-al-Iqtiṣādīyah al-Muʻāṣirah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 429–467. Retrieved from: https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticle/617/6/1/213801
Hetler, A. (2025, 2 1). What is ChatGPT? Retrieved from techtarget: https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/ChatGPT
Mālikī, Wafāʼ Fawwāz. (2023). Dawr taṭbīqāt al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī fī taʻzīz al-istirātījiyyāt al-taʻlīmiyyah fī al-taʻlīm al-ʻālī (murājaʻat al-adabiyyāt). Majallat al-ʻUlūm al-Tarbawiyyah wa-al-Nafsiyyah, pp. 93–107.
Pacewicz, A. (2019). Plato and the Classical Theory of Knowledge. Folia Philosophica, 91-114.
Qaddūr, Rashīd. (2024). Naẓariyyat al-maʻrifah bayna Arisṭū wa-Kānṭ. Majallat al-Mufakkir, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 328–355. Retrieved 27 1, 2025, from: https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticle/456/8/1/250516
Rāshid, Najm ʻAbd Allāh. (2024). Taʼthīr al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī ʻalá mustaqbal al-iʻlām. al-Majallah al-Duwaliyyah li-al-Buḥūth al-ʻIlmiyyah, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 65–85. Retrieved 1 2, 2025, from: https://vsrp.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/4-IJSR-Vol.-3-No.-7-July-2024-Paper3-Dr.-Nejm.pdf
Swain, S., & Gutas, D. (1998). Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco‐Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early Ábbasid Society (Second–Fourth/Eighth–Tenth Centuries). New York: Routledge.
Wachtel, E. (1999). How Writing Came About. Technology and Culture. Technology and Culture, 40(1), 128-129.
Yābān, al-Taʻlīm fī. (1 2, 2025). Istikhdām al-dhakāʼ al-iṣṭināʻī fī al-dirāsah wa-al-baḥth al-ʻilmī fī al-Yābān. Retrieved from Yābān bi-al-ʻArabī: https://www.nippon.com/ar/japan-data/h01946/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Talal Al-Zuhairi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
